© 2012 Terrell Neasley |
– Ansel Adams
In the majority of cases, this is what it boils down to. The Print. Nothing else really matters. I’m not talking about the shots that wind up on Facebook that you took with your cell phone from the Christmas party last night. And this isn’t intended for people who will only use their cameras to take pics of family and family events to share with other members of the family and friends. This goes to those desiring to “Get Started in Photography”, whether you turn pro or do it as an amateur/enthusiast. Its the print that matters most. If you have a moment, check out my April 2012 post regarding, “Focus on The Print“.
Why do I say this? What point am I trying to emphasis? Well, its mainly regarding photogs who give away hi-res images on a CD to their client and never do anything beyond shooting and editing. This job is then incomplete. The photographic process is three parts, not 2. Its Shoot, Edit, and then Print. Cutting corners by not completing this last stage kills your own money and that of mine because I am part of the industry. Rangefinder Magazine did an excellent article in their annual “State of the Industry” year-end report on photography trends in the US. One of the last parts in this report covers the “Album-less Bride”.
© 2012 Terrell Neasley The Album-less Bride,
“But that doesn’t mean commercial photographers aren’t concerned about the negative effects of digital and of file sharing. Last year, WPPI described a growing phenomenon: the album-less bride. “What is an album-less bride?” writes Kathleen Hawkins, a Florida-based photographer and author, in the WPPI newsletter late last year. “Amazingly, many of the photographers who took pride in the fact that they were artists and not business people are now seeking the quick and easy sale with the evolution of digital photography.” Or in other words, an album-less bride is a shoot-and-burn job in which the client (often a bride) gets the master images on a disc to do what she wants with them; she, in fact, doesn’t order any prints from the photographer at all.
As a business practice, shoot-and-burn has a collateral effect, says Graphistudio director Maureen Neises. “The photographers that cave in and give their clients a disc are creating a pent-up pressure in the market place,” she says. “The trend now is that consumers are calling us directly.” Or, she says, they are searching online book printing services. “Shoot-and-burn photographers that provide a disc are not finishing the job.” – Excerpt from Rangefinder Magazine’s State of the Industry: Business Trends 2012
© 2012 Terrell Neasley |
The thing is, the article goes on to say that a representative from one of the largest album makers said their sales have not fallen off, despite this trend. This is because they have been getting more contacts directly from the consumer to make their own albums, which means they take your hard-earned work, your copyrighted images, and make their own products from them, doing so with your permission!. I won’t even get into the plethora of stories I hear from other photogs who’s clients also RE-EDIT those Hi-Res shots to their own liking or at the very least RE-CROP the images. Sometimes this is a crop to get a close-up portrait shot (creating two images from the one) OR, they do it to take off your watermark. I talked to another shooter just last week who represented the business side of a husband-wife photography studio. From everything I understand, they are very successful at what they do. They have a great studio and I can’t help but respect their business. However, I have to entirely disagree with their business model. They feel like their market demands the CD and therefore that’s what they cater to. Specializing in weddings, the Hi-Res CD is given to the client with little to no concentration on prints. “The market doesn’t support prints. They all want CDs.” Well, of course they do! The market would also support free photography services. If you want to stifle the business of photography, keep doing this. Its analogous to cutting small slits in your own necks and bleeding out slowly.
© 2012 Terrell Neasley |
© 2012 Terrell Neasley |
I'm posting this to a boudoir group I belogn to because many of them do not understand the importance of elevating the profession and the consumer's expectations rather than playing down to them.
When people print (and often edit) a professional's work without understanding the creative process behind it, others don't value your work and this reflects poorly on you/your studio/your brand. Friends who look at cheap prints with bad color think two things: 1) wow, you actually paid someone to make you look that way? and 2) Ugh, I'd NEVER hire that studio!
And believe me, friends will overlook friends' poor spending decisions but they sure as hell won't overlook bad photography (or good photography printed poorly).
You wouldn't give away your negatives if you were shooting film, so don't give away your "negatives" (including negative impressions!) when shooting digital.
Protect yourself and only offer digital files in low res, web-ready sizes with your watermark faintly embedded in the center. PRINT PRINT PRINT PRINT PRINT professionally!
By the way, I have a pair of scissors, but I don't think I'll be cutting my own hair anytime soon. I'll wait until I have the money to pay someone else who is trained to cut and style hair to do it for me.
I could have used your commentary for this post and saved myself the time. Excellent points.